Current approaches to assessing the degree of perinatal risk

Aim: to study the factors leading adverse perinatal outcomes allowing, on this basis, predict degree of risk. Materials and Methods. The medical records 155 patients who performed delivery in 2019–2021 were retrospectively analyzed. following groups formed: main group included 56 with (9 fetuses died antenatally, 36 born below Apgar score 5, 9 newborns within first 168 hours extrauterine life, 2 infant deaths). control 99 favorable outcomes. While assessing data retrieved from records, sociobiological laboratory-instrumental indicators, obstetric-gynecological somatic anamnesis, presence extragenital pathology, process, information related child condition at time birth early neonatal period Results. In group, significant differences revealed compared respectively: high parity (3 or more deliveries) – 11 (19.6 %) 15 (15.1 (p = 0.001); vomiting pregnant women gestation 27 (48.2 14 (14.1 0.005); uterine scar after two caesarean sections 7 (12.5 (2.1 0.009); former abortions 24 (42.8 16 (16.1 0.0017); acute respiratory viral infection trimester 21 (37.5 13 (13.1 threatened abortion second 23 (41.0 0.0005); Doppler-based blood flow disorders 17 (30.3 (11.1 0.008) third (16.0 3 (3.0 0.006); altered amniotic fluid index according ultrasound 6 (10.7 1 (1.0 0.011); intrauterine growth retardation (26.7 4 (4.0 0.012); severe preeclampsia 0.04). pregnancy was finished prematurely 41.1 % cases 100% term group. Conclusion. risk identified, which manifested trimesters may be predictors for Based results groups, it convinced that topic predicting unfavorable outcome is currently far being disclosed, a long meticulous path search, analysis comparison.